PhilSoc Meetings

PhilSoc usually holds seven meetings each academic year, in October, November, January, February, March, May and June (AGM). At most meetings, a full paper is read; other meetings take the format of a thematic symposium. Significant announcements made at meetings are reported on the homepage of the Society's website.



Unless otherwise indicated, tea is served at 3.45pm and the meeting begins at 4.15pm.

The Society has a YouTube channel where video recordings of some of its past meetings may be found.




PhilSoc welcomes proposals for papers to be read at meetings. Proposals should be forwarded to the Honorary Secretary (contact details on the Contact page). Papers may be on any topic falling within the scope of PhilSoc's interests, but speakers are asked to bear in mind that the audience will represent a wide range of linguistic interests, and papers should therefore be accessible to non-specialists.

Jun
13
2026

June 2026

AGM and Lecture: Awareness, repertoire, and control: How individual cognition drives group change in London English
Devyani Sharma (University of Oxford)

The AGM and this talk will take place at St Catharine's College, Cambridge.

Show more

The role of the individual in large-scale community change has been a long-standing puzzle. Studies have considered conservative and innovative usage, social network location, and identity, among other factors. In this talk, I examine individual cognition and its important role in both larger community change and social positioning. I first present new findings for real-time change over 20 years in the phonology and syntax of London English varieties (www.generationsoflondonenglish.org). The findings support a ‘punctuated equilibrium’ model for English (Nevalainen et al. 2020), showing a current phase of stability after the emergence of new vernaculars a generation earlier. Demographic tipping-points and social networks are clear factors in these community dynamics, so how does individual cognition fit in? First, I show variable awareness of features (or their social meanings), which can accelerate or inhibit change. Second, I examine how individual speech repertoires can reveal both how a person participates in community systems and, relatedly, how the speech of ‘interior groups’ (Labov 2001) leads change. And finally, I argue that fine-grained differences in speech control can be consequential. These three closely related phenomena were all noted in early variationist theory but have not always been consistently investigated. I suggest that they are critical for accurate community and identity accounts.